Fact Sheet: Violent Offenders

About the fact-sheet series: Fact sheets summarize current literature into a short (2 page) document intended for distribution. Fact-sheets are extremely useful for academics, professionals or laypeople who are in contact with offenders, victims, corrections or the legal system in any way. They provide a means to disseminate empirically based information in a way that is both quick and useful. Fact sheets undergo the EAPL-S peer review process and editing before publication.
 
About the author: This article was written as a guest post by Kamila Grochowska, MA student at the University of Wrocław (Poland), and Magdalena Kossowska, MA student at the Catholic University of Lublin (Poland).

View this document in it's full glory by downloading the pdf here.


 

 

Violent offenders

Violent offenders are individuals who are incarcerated due to any criminal charge for a violent offence against another individual—including assault, assault causing bodily harm, wounding, attempted homicide, homicide, kidnapping, forcible confinement, armed robbery and all ‘hands-on’ sexual offences. Although they are significantly different from other sub-groups of offenders (i.e. non-violent or sexual offenders) in terms of personality characteristics, psychopathology and reconviction rates, they cannot be considered a homogenous group. Violent offenders score significantly higher on the hostility, depression, tension, psychopathic, impulsivity, and aggression (when measured by the SHAPS Special Hospitals Assessment of Personality and Socialization) compared to other type of offenders. They are more likely to have a history of substance abuse, express suicidal or homicidal ideation, have a history of employment problems and exhibit a personality disorder (most commonly ASPD). In addition, violent offenders display a significant cognitive distortion (such as errors of thinking or significantly poorer moral value judgments) and structural and functional abnormalities in the frontal lobe.

Recidivism rate

Factors that are taken into consideration when predicting recidivism among violent offenders are considered to be very similar to those of a sexual kind. The strongest predictors are:

  • juvenile delinquency
  • antisocial personality
  • age
  • prior criminal history
  • minority race
  • substance abuse

However, personal distress and low intelligence take little effect on violent offenders in the terms of recidivism rate prediction and risk. According to the U.S Bureau of Justice Statistics reconviction rates did not change significantly between the years 1983 and 1994 and remained stable for this type of offence. However, the number of violent offenders who committed a crime again changed from 39% to 74% (35% raise) in the period of next 10 years so it is the highest rate of reconviction among all type of offenders (general offenders - 18% raise and sexual ones – 17% raise).

Treatment opportunities

There are many types of treatment that are used on violent offenders. There are few treatment approaches that may be used regardless of a type of committed offence, and specific ones addressed to a specific type of offending such as family violence or sex offending. The main ones are:

  • cognitive-behavioral approach (impulse control, problem solving, conflict resolution);
  • cognitive self-change programs (challenging criminal thinking, i.e. pro-criminal beliefs and anti-social attitudes);
  • anger management programs (anger control, relaxation and social skills training, substance abuse education);
  • multi-model program (focus on a wide range of offender’s specific needs)

Additionally, according to the latest reviews, anger management methods reduce violence among participants but not offending. Furthermore, it is less effective than multiple models that reduce both violent (7-8%) and non-violent (8-11%) reoffending rates. It was also found that noncompleters of treatments are more likely to commit a crime again in comparison to the ones who completed it. Moreover, higher risk clients are more likely to commit an offence again so correctional interventions should be more focused on them as recidivism reduction might be more effective then. Interventions consisting of longer sessions and durations are also more advisable as they are proven to give more influential and permanent treatment outcomes.

Psychopathy and violent crime

Psychopathy is a severe personality disorder characterized by a lack of remorse, guilt and empathy. Moreover, a psychopathic individual is behaviorally impulsive and irresponsible and is at risk of displaying extreme antisocial behaviors including elevated levels of both reactive and instrumental aggression. As it is shown in multiple studies, 5 – 35% of incarcerated individuals are psychopaths, and, furthermore, as outlined by Hare: "They commit more than twice as many violent and aggressive acts, both in and out of prison, as do other criminals". Psychopathy is a well-documented predictor of violent criminal behavior among various offender groups (male, female and juvenile offenders). Research indicates that psychopaths offend more frequently and more violently and they are four to eight times more likely to engage in violent recidivism.

Conclusion

As Violent Offenders have proven to be very costly (in terms of damage caused, law enforcement efforts and correctional and rehabilitation costs) it is very important to continue research not only on how to prevent, punish and rehabilitate this group but also on underlining the causes of the phenomenon itself. What is more, it may be possible to help them more effectively and on a long term basis by considering recidivism rate risks and paying more attention to high risk clients.

Quick summary

  • Violent offenders display distinct personality traits, cognitions and brain structures.
  • Damages caused by violent offenders are very costly
  • Reconviction rates remain stable over time
  • Noncompleters of treatments are more likely to commit a crime again
  • Psychopathy is a strong predictor of violent offending

Where can I get more information?

Information from the EAPL-S is available online, in PDF, or as paper brochures sent through the mail. If you would like to have EAPL-S publications, you can order hardcopies for a nominal fee through This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

References

  1. Barriga, A. Q., Landau, J. R., Stinson, B. L., Liau, A. K., & Gibbs, J. C. (2000). Cognitive distortion and problem behaviors in adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 36-56.
  2. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2012). Reentry Trends In The U.S. Recidivism. Retrieved 23.03.2012 from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/reentry/recidivism.cfm
  3. Hanson, R. K. (January, 2000). Risk Assessment. Retrieved 23.03.2012 from: http://www.cj-resources.com/CJ_Corrections_pdfs/InfoPac%20Risk%20assessment%20booklet%20-%20Hanson%202000.pdf
  4. Harris G. T. Rice M. E. Cormier C. A. (2002). Prospective replication of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide in predicting violent recidivism among forensic patients. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 377–394.
  5. Hoaken, P. Allaby, D. and Earle, J. (2007). Executive Cognitive Functioning and the Recognition of Facial Expressions of Emotion in Incarcerated Violent Offenders, Non-Violent Offenders, and Controls. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 412–421.
  6. Leam, A. C. Browne, K. D. Beech A. Stringer, I. (2006). Differences in personality and risk characteristics in sex, violent and general offenders. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 16, 183–194.
  7. Macklin A., & Gilbert R. (June, 2011)  Working with Indigenous offenders  to end violence  [Research brief]. Retrieved 23.03.2012 from: http://www.indigenousjustice.gov.au/briefs/brief011.pdf
  8. Raine, A. Lencz, T. Bihrle, S. LaCasse, L. Colletti, P. (2000). Reduced prefrontal gray matter volume and reduced autonomic activity in antisocial personality disorder. Arch General Psychiatry, 57, 119–127.
  9. Wormith, J. & Olver, M. E. (2002). Offender treatment attrition and its relationship with risk, responsivity and recidivism. Criminal Justice And Behavior, 29(4), 447-471.
  10. Vess J. & Skelton A. (2010). Sexual and violent recidivism by offender type and actuarial risk: reoffending rates for rapists, child molesters and mixed-victim offenders. Skelton Psychology, Crime & Law, 16 (7), 541-554. 

Fact Sheet Series Information

EAPL-S publications are in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without the permission from the European Association of Psychology and Law Student Society (EAPL-S). EAPL-S encourages you to reproduce them and use them in your efforts to improve awareness of issues in psychology, corrections and law. Citation of the European Association of Psychology and Law as a source is appreciated. However, using these materials inappropriately can raise legal or ethical concerns, so we ask you to use these guidelines:

  • EAPL-S does not endorse or recommend any commercial products, processes, or services, and publications may not be used for advertising or endorsement purposes.
  • EAPL-S does not provide specific medical advice or treatment recommendations, legal action or referrals; these materials may not be used in a manner that has the appearance of such information.
  • EAPL-S requests that organizations not alter publications in a way that will jeopardize the integrity and "brand" when using publications.
  • Addition of EAPL and EAPL-S logos and website links may not have the appearance of EAPL-S endorsement of any specific commercial products or services or medical treatments or legal services.
If you have questions regarding these guidelines and use of EAPL-S publications, please contact the EAPL-S at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Overview of Fact Sheet topics covered to date